API REFERENCE
Beta
Start a Workflow
Starts a workflow with your data supplied inline, in one call. No session is involved.
This is the direct route. There are deliberately two ways to start a workflow — here with terms inline, or against a staged session — but only one way to follow one afterwards, and both routes return the same workflow envelope.
Use this when you will start one workflow against a set of data. Use a session when you will start more than one against the same data, or when you build the loan up over several calls: staging is free, so starting two workflows from one session sends the loan once rather than twice.
Get the URL to submit against from your Pitchpoint Account Representative, along with the service and model values your account is entitled to use.
This call starts a real workflow and is billed. Each call is an independent workflow, never a retry of a previous one.
Sample
url="https://api.pointservices.com/riskinsight-services-ws/resources/v1/workflows"
curl -X POST "${url}" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer your_access_token_here" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Accept: application/json" \
-d '{
"product": {
"service": "ADV",
"model": "FirstOrder"
},
"correlationId": "alpha_numeric_string_to_help_identify_this_workflow",
"terms": [
{
"person": {
"firstName": "Jane",
"lastName": "Sample",
"ssn": "000-00-0000",
"dob": "01/31/1980"
}
},
{
"property": {
"propertyUsage": "PrimaryResidence",
"propertyType": "Detached",
"address": {
"addressLine1": "1 Sample Street",
"city": "Sampleton",
"state": "NY",
"postalCode": "00000"
}
}
}
]
}'
Header Properties
| Property | Value | Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Authorization | Bearer your token | true |
| Content-Type | application/json | true |
| Accept | application/json | false |
| X-PPS-UserAlias | your value | false |
| X-PPS-UserAgent | your value | false |
| X-PPS-CorrelationID | your value | false |
Send Content-Type: application/json on every POST, including one with no body at all. In deployed environments a request that arrives without it is refused by edge protection in front of the application, with a 403 carrying an HTML body rather than any response documented here — and because the service never sees the request, nothing can explain it to you. A local or unprotected deployment may accept the same request, so do not take a working call there as evidence the header is optional.
Accept is not enforced — a request without it is answered normally with JSON — but send it anyway, so that a future change to content negotiation cannot alter what you receive.
X-PPS-CorrelationID is a support-tracing header and is not the same thing as the correlationId field in a request body. Only the body field is recorded against an order and searched by Find Workflows; setting the header globally in your HTTP client does not make your orders findable.
See the Common Headers guide for details on the optional X-PPS-* headers above.
Request Data Properties
| Property | Description | Type |
|---|---|---|
| product | (mandatory) The product to run. Both service and model are required. Free text rather than a closed list; a pair that does not resolve is a 400. | object |
| terms | (mandatory) The loan, as an array of terms. Must be present and non-empty. See SAMI v2 Terms. | array |
| correlationId | (optional) Your own reference for this run, at most 255 characters. Not required to be unique. This is the value Find Workflows searches. | string |
Only three things about terms are checked when you submit:
termsmust be present and a non-empty array."terms": []is rejected.- Every element must be a JSON object — never
null, never a bare string or number. - Every element must carry one of the eleven branch keys:
person,property,participant,loanTerms,loanToValue,transactionDetail,loanDetail,refinance,housingExpense,closing,company.
Everything else is permissive. An absent field is accepted without complaint, and a key this service does not recognize is ignored rather than refused, so a misspelled field name will not be reported back to you. Read the term descriptions as a statement of what is understood, not as a validator.
Send exactly one key per term. A term carrying two keys is not currently rejected: one of the two facts is silently dropped, and the submission still stages and runs normally. A mistake here therefore surfaces as missing information in the result rather than as an error on the request, which makes it expensive to trace. Split every fact into its own term.
Responses
Not every response carries the same body, so branch on the status code first, and then on what the body actually contains. Some responses carry the messages envelope described on this page; others carry a JSON problem document with an entirely different set of fields; others carry no JSON at all. A client that calls its JSON parser on every non-2xx body, or that reads messages[0].code without first checking that messages is present, will fail on the responses it is most likely to meet.
202
Accepted for processing. Identical in shape to the 202 on Start a Workflow in a Session, except that sessionId is absent: no session was involved.
workflowId is the handle for every later read and reconfirm and is stable for the life of the workflow. runId identifies this one execution and addresses nothing — no endpoint accepts it. On a first run the two share a numeric suffix and differ only by prefix, so use the prefix, never the digits, to tell them apart.
No timestamps are set on an acknowledgment; ordered, fulfilled, completed, serviceable and referenceNumber all appear only on a later read.
Example:
{
"workflow": {
"workflowId": "wfpop_0000000000002080001",
"runId": "wfrunpop_0000000000002080001",
"correlationId": "alpha_numeric_string_to_help_identify_this_workflow",
"product": {
"service": "ADV",
"model": "FirstOrder"
},
"productType": "ADV",
"productName": "FirstOrder",
"status": "processing",
"reconfirmAvailable": false
},
"messages": [
{
"code": "ACCEPTED",
"text": "workflow accepted for processing",
"timestamp": "2026-08-07T15:01:42Z"
}
],
"links": {
"self": {
"href": "https://api.pointservices.com/riskinsight-services-ws/resources/v1/workflows/wfpop_0000000000002080001"
},
"reconfirm": {
"href": "https://api.pointservices.com/riskinsight-services-ws/resources/v1/workflows/wfpop_0000000000002080001",
"method": "POST"
}
}
}
400
The workflow was refused and nothing was billed. Causes: product absent, malformed, or carrying only one of service and model; a pair that does not resolve to a product you may use; terms absent, empty, or containing an element that is not an object or carries none of the eleven branch keys; a correlationId longer than 255 characters.
An unresolvable product will not become resolvable on its own — correct it rather than retrying.
A 400 arrives in two different body shapes, decided by how far the request got before it was refused. Check for a messages array first, and fall back to the problem document when it is absent.
A value this service evaluated and rejected carries the messages envelope with the code VALIDATION_ERROR.
| Property | Description | Type |
|---|---|---|
| messages | (present) Always an array, never null. Carries one message whose code is VALIDATION_ERROR. | array |
| messages[].code | (present) Always VALIDATION_ERROR on this shape. | string |
| messages[].text | (present) Human-readable description of what was wrong. Never machine-parsed — the wording is not contractual. | string |
| messages[].timestamp | (present) RFC 3339 UTC with a trailing Z. Fractional seconds appear only when they are not zero, so parse this value rather than slicing it. | string |
Example:
{
"messages": [
{
"code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
"text": "the requested product does not resolve",
"timestamp": "2026-08-07T15:01:42Z"
}
]
}
A body that could not be read as this request at all — a JSON array where an object was expected, a field of the wrong type, or malformed JSON — is refused before the service evaluates any value, so there is nothing to put in a messages array. It carries a JSON problem document instead, with Content-Type: application/problem+json and no messages key and no VALIDATION_ERROR code.
Example:
{
"type": "about:blank",
"title": "Bad Request",
"status": 400,
"detail": "Request body has a field that must be a value of type SessionStartRequest",
"instance": "urn:pps:request:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
}
A client that reads messages[0].code on every 400 without checking that messages exists will throw on this second shape. Branch on the presence of messages, not on the status.
No workflow is started and no handle is issued.
401
No credential the platform could accept reached the service.
The body is a JSON problem document, not the messages envelope, and the response carries a WWW-Authenticate: Bearer realm="Helix" challenge. Read the machine-readable part from type; title and detail are human copy and are not contractual.
| Property | Description | Type |
|---|---|---|
| type | (present) An absolute URI identifying the problem. about:blank when no credential was sent at all. | string |
| title | (present) Short human-readable summary. | string |
| status | (present) Repeats the HTTP status code. | number |
| detail | (present) Human-readable explanation. Never machine-parsed. | string |
| instance | (present) An identifier for this one request. Quote it when contacting support. | string |
Examples:
{
"type": "about:blank",
"title": "Unauthorized",
"status": 401,
"detail": "Authentication is required. Present a bearer access token in the Authorization header.",
"instance": "urn:pps:request:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
}
{
"type": "https://pointservices.com/problems/invalid-token",
"title": "The access token was not accepted",
"status": 401,
"detail": "The access token was rejected.",
"instance": "urn:pps:request:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
}
The second form carries WWW-Authenticate: Bearer realm="Helix", error="invalid_token", and is what a token the service will not accept returns.
Treat a 401 and a 403 alike: both mean your credential did not work, and neither distinguishes reliably enough to build separate recovery paths on. Obtain a fresh access token and retry the request once. If it fails again, stop and surface the error rather than looping — repeated attempts with a credential the service has already refused will meet the rate throttle described below.
403
Most often your account is not entitled to the product requested. Check service and model against what your Account Representative provisioned. No workflow is started and nothing is billed.
The body does not carry the messages envelope, so there is no code to branch on. Branch on the status alone, and treat the body as opaque: do not assume it is empty, and do not assume it is JSON.
A 403 is not always a permissions problem — try a fresh token first. A credential the service will not honour can be refused with either status, so a sudden wall of 403s on calls that worked a moment ago is more often an expired token than a change to your entitlements. Obtain a new access token and retry once. If it fails again, then treat it as entitlement and talk to your Account Representative.
A 403 is also produced at the edge, before this service is reached, when a request omits Content-Type or carries a value resembling SQL injection or cross-site scripting. Those refusals carry an HTML body and this service never sees them. A value that legitimately contains such text should be encoded — Base64, for instance — rather than sent raw.
404
The path you called is not served. Check that the URL carries the riskinsight-services-ws context root.
This path takes no resource identifier, so a 404 here means the path itself is not served — most often a URL missing the riskinsight-services-ws context root. The refusal is produced by infrastructure in front of the application, which never sees the request. It carries no body this API defines, so branch on the status alone and do not attempt to parse what comes back. Its exact shape depends on the environment you are calling.
If a 404 has no body, check the context root before anything else.
409
WORKFLOW_WRITE_CONFLICT — a concurrent change was detected and this attempt lost the race. Final for that attempt: the service does not retry it, so you decide whether to resubmit. No code path emits this today — concurrent changes are serialized server side, and what is not yet built is the translation of a lost race into this response rather than a generic failure. Handle it anyway: the code is part of the permanent vocabulary and may begin appearing without notice.
Branch on messages[].code, never on the status alone. A 409 on this surface means more than one thing, and the corrective action differs by cause.
| Property | Description | Type |
|---|---|---|
| messages | (present) Always an array, never null. | array |
| messages[].code | (present) One of the codes described above for this status. | string |
| messages[].text | (present) Human copy. Never machine-parsed. | string |
| messages[].timestamp | (present) RFC 3339 UTC with a trailing Z, fractional seconds only when they are not zero. | string |
A conflict can also arrive without a messages array, as a JSON problem document carrying type, title, status, detail and instance. When messages is absent, read the machine-readable part from the last path segment of type. Treat the conflict as final for that attempt in either shape, and check that messages is present before reading messages[0].code.
429
Refused by a rate throttle at the edge, before this service is reached. The throttle counts requests per source address across every endpoint on both the session and workflow surfaces.
The refusal carries no body, no messages array and no Retry-After header, and this service never sees it, so it will not appear in any support trace.
Back off and resume. When following a workflow to completion, an interval that stays clear of the throttle is two seconds for the first two checks, then five, then ten seconds thereafter, with an overall deadline after which you stop and investigate.
500
An unhandled failure inside the service. The body does not carry the messages envelope, so branch on the status alone.
A 500 means the outcome is unknown, not that nothing happened. A failure raised after a write has already committed leaves that write in place. A workflow may have been started and billed. Do not simply retry. Search Find Workflows for the correlationId you sent, and start another only if nothing comes back. Retrying blind is how one order becomes two, and nothing on this surface removes a duplicate for you.